My Hobbit holiday
After following the
progress of the making of the movie (by watching the production
videos, reading interviews and articles), I was very eager to finally
be able to watch the movie. I had planned a little holiday just for
this purpose (and I needed time off anyway). I went to Auckland for
three nights and had planned to watch the Hobbit at least twice: once
in normal 3D and once in HFR 3D – to see the difference.
A lot has been written
about the content of the movies. Critics were quite critical and
wrote lukewarm reviews. Of which I didn't really read any, because
what do I care? I wanted to see Ian McKellen as Gandalf again and
nothing a critic would write would have been able to stop me. I was
looking forward to the experience and I have to say that I was not
disappointed. I ended up watching the movie three times, twice in HFR
and once in normal 3D on an IMAX screen.
Normal 3D vs. HFR 3D
So, did I notice a
difference between the two formats? I did. After having seen it in
HFR 3D, seeing it in normal 3D feels like down-grading. Normal 3D
seemed a bit chaotic in places and made some scenes look unnatural.
The HFR version, however, made me feel like I was right in the middle
of it. Everything was nice and clear and seeing Galadriel in this
movie format was just breath-taking. The moment she appears on the
screen and moves around, it just feels like you have been pulled into
a real fantasy world. It feels like you could touch her if you only
got close enough. All the characters do actually look wonderful but
my favourite were and still are Gandalf, Galadriel, Elrond and
Saruman. So this movie was such a treat because you get to see them
all together in the same scene.
The movie is filled with
beauty, but also with vile ugliness. The orcs and goblins truly look
disgusting in HFR but that's what they're supposed to be like. You
wouldn't want to meet those creatures and their wargs. I wonder what
Lord of the Rings would have been like in HFR. Maybe it would have
been a bit too scary!
So, in my opinion Jackson
and his team did a fantastic job with that new technology. It looks
great, the movie turned out to be very beautiful and it's a beauty
that's hard to describe.
The movie's
characters
As most of you will
already know: there are many characters in the Hobbit. 13 dwarves,
one Hobbit, three wizards, two elves, lots of goblins and orcs and of
course Gollum. Not all dwarves have big roles in the first movie. The
only ones who really stood out for me were Thorin (as he is the
leader), Balin, Bofur, Fili and Kili. Of course, all the other
dwarves are introduced and have one or the other thing to say, but in
my eyes, the focus of the first movie was on the characters I just
named. Other people might have conceived it otherwise, of course. I
am quite sure that the other movies will show more of the dwarves
that did not say much yet. What I have seen of the dwarves so far was
very good though. They are quite easy to keep apart, they all have a
background story of one or the other sort (we don't know them all
yet, though) and they have good dynamics, i.e. it's a pleasure to see
those actors doing their job.
Then there are the three
wizards. We already know Gandalf and Saruman from the LotR movies and
the books. I was looking forward to seeing them again. Not much has
to be said about them. Ian McKellen and Christopher Lee are two of
the best actors of our time. And they are splendid. However, you do
notice that the scene with Gandalf, Saruman, Galadriel and Elrond was
filmed with Christopher Lee being in a different location. He does
seem a bit detached, like he is talking to the air around him instead
of to the other actors. I guess that was the only thing I found a bit
disappointing because I loved the way Lee and McKellen interacted in
LotR.
Galadriel and Elrond are
incredibly beautiful. When you see Hugo Weaving with his usual looks,
you just couldn't imagine that he actually is Elrond. He looks so
magnificent as Lord Elrond. Cate Blanchett's beauty most likely did
not need much additional work. She looked otherworldly, she acted
wonderfully and her interaction with Gandalf is just beautiful beyond
words.
So, what about the third
wizard? It's Radagast the Brown, who is mentioned in the books but
doesn't really have a huge role. I'm not really sure what I think
about his role in the movies. On one hand, it's adorable that he
cares so much for animals. He's a bit like me in the sense that he
prefers the company of animals to the company of people. On the other
hand, he is different from what I had imagined. And the idea of the
sleigh drawn by rabbits... I don't know. I'll have to see the other
two movies to actually get a full picture of his importance (nor lack
thereof).
Then there is Bilbo
Baggins. I have to admit that I never heard of Martin Freeman before
and when I saw him in interviews, I didn't like him. He seemed
arrogant, aloof and like he felt like he was better than the rest of
the world. I wasn't sure whether I'd like him as Bilbo. Fortunately,
he seems to be a good actor. So I like him a lot more as Bilbo than I
like him as he is during interviews. He's doing a good job and Bilbo
is likeable – but I don't think I'll ever count Martin Freeman as
one of my favourite actors.
Azog and the Goblin King
are two other characters that are worth mentioning. Of course, you
don't see much of the actors' normal looks behind all the props and
make-up but the acting is well done. Azog does come across as very
evil and without a heart. He truly gives you the feeling that he is
bad right to the core, vicious and cruel. The Goblin King is more
like a something out of a comedy. Utterly ugly, evil, but also not
very intelligent. I think, the evil guys in the movie are doing a
good job and they hit the right spots.
Last but not least, there
is Gollum. And Andy Serkis is doing a fantastic job. The riddle scene
between Gollum and Bilbo is just amazing. You'll have to see it to
understand the brilliance of it. You can't keep yourself from being
amused even though it's such a life-threatening situation for poor
Bilbo.
The story and
soundtrack of the unexpected journey
People who have read
Tolkien's book will be familiar with the stories in the Hobbit and
will recognise the parts that aren't in the Hobbit but somewhere else
in Tolkien's lore. I am not giving away the story line here because
some readers might not know the story yet and I don't want to spoil
the experience.
Someone told me that
reviewers that the movie was too long, that there was too much story
telling and too many different stories. I think that's just rubbish.
Of course, if people are used to certain other types of movies that
don't have much of a story at all, then the movie will be a little
overwhelming. You learn about the history of the dwarven Kingdom of
Erebor, you learn about Mirkwood, about wizards, more about Hobbits,
more about dwarves and some background of their difficulties with
elves. You learn about a dragon, about orcs and goblins and about the
background of Thorin Oakenshield. There are a lot of stories in the
first movie, and more stories will follow with the other two movies.
We're talking Tolkien here, not vampires or Harry Potter.
I felt like the movie was
just right, maybe even too short. I'm looking forward to the extended
edition and I especially hope that we will get to hear and see the
dwarves sing a longer version of the song “Over the misty
mountains”. The soundtrack, by the way, is fantastic. It is a well
balanced mix of new tracks that are intertwined with familiar
melodies. The soundtrack never feels wrong and the main theme is just
glorious. If Howard Shore doesn't get an Oscar for that, it would be
very disappointing.
Conclusion
If you are a fan of
Tolkien, then you should enjoy the movie – at least I wouldn't see
a reason why you shouldn't. There might be one or the other thing
that is a little odd or disappointing, but you never really get a
perfect movie that makes everyone 100% happy. Even LotR wasn't
perfect (for me, it had too much Arwen and I would have loved to see
the full dialogue in which Gandalf and Saruman talk about being
white, grey and coloured wizards).
My favourite moments:
- The song “Over the misty mountains”
- Gandalf, Galadriel, Elrond and Saruman in one scene
- The interaction between Gandalf and Galadriel, in which their faces tell the story without really needing words
- Thorin Oakenshield's background story and his encounter with Azog at the end
- The eagles – just glorious in HFR 3D
What about you?
Did you see the movie?
What was your experience like? Did you watch it in HFR, normal 3D or
2D? What were your favourite moments and was there anything you found
disappointing?
Good review Kim. Not a great movie, but a very entertaining one that deserves to be seen in the regular-version, mainly because the 48fps seems to be messing everybody up. Myself included.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. The HFR didn't mess me up at all. Of the two versions I saw, I preferred this version. The normal 3D seemed a bit chaotic to me, the HFR on the other hand was very beautiful to look at. But I guess it's a matter of taste. I just loved it :)
Delete